Trump has a plan, dishonest NY Times fearmongering and other commentary

Economy watch: Trump Has a Plan

“A caller MSNBC sentiment piece” inadvertently explained “the benefits” of nan Trump economical plan, points retired Andy Puzder astatine Fox News. The portion complained that “ ‘Trump is obsessed pinch nan macroeconomics’ ” and has a “ ‘big-picture, 10,000-foot position of nan economy.’ ” Huh? “No 1 should knock a statesmanlike candidate” for being “ ‘obsessed’ pinch addressing macroeconomic issues specified arsenic inflation, wages, liking rates, economical maturation and nan deficit,” issues cardinal to people’s voting decisions. Harris “has nary plan” for those issues, isolated from she has “unabashedly praised nan existent plan, a grounded large authorities hodgepodge of monolithic spending and accrued regulatory unit called Bidenomics,” which put america successful this mess. Trump’s scheme involves “cutting taxes, slashing growth-killing regulations, and incentivizing home power production, including fossil fuels.”

From nan right: Dishonest Times Fearmongering

“The New York Times has ever charged Trump pinch demagoguery,” but now makes his “allegedly darkening rhetoric an obsessive theme,” though “Democrats routinely postulation successful fear-mongering” against nan right, seethes City Journal’s Heather Mac Donald. The Times’ “crusade” conscionable reached “a caller level of duplicity” arsenic it claimed Trump has “openly suggested turning nan subject connected American citizens simply because they reason his candidacy.” In fact, “Trump said nary specified thing”; nan quote nan Times cites was successful consequence to a mobility astir “the anticipation of riots breaking retired if Trump wins.” It is nan media’s “dishonesty, not Trump’s worldview, that is becoming progressively acheronian and that threatens nan anticipation of civilian coexistence.”

Foreign desk: A Perilous ‘Escalation’ Phobia

“When it comes to war, President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris couldn’t beryllium much self-contradictory,” marvels Shay Khatiri astatine The Wall Street Journal. They tout their “unwavering commitments” to Israel and Ukraine but “hedge by trying to restrain Israelis and Ukrainians.” Why? They are “extremely risk-averse” astir “escalation.” Yet their fears ever “prove baseless,” and anyway, “escalation prevention isn’t nan governmental nonsubjective of war; triumph is. Escalation guidance is simply a instrumentality that serves a governmental purpose.” If Harris becomes president, “expect much of nan same” — and that “bodes sick for America’s nationalist information and world stability.” Iran will “almost certainly” support threatening location war. “Vladimir Putin will trial her by returning to atomic threats.” Fact is: “The phobia of escalation will only induce much war.”

Eye connected Albany: Hochul’s Energy Double Standard

Coca-Cola past twelvemonth announced plans for a monolithic “milk-processing installation successful Monroe County,” pinch “few specifications connected really specified an energy-intensive cognition could fresh wrong Albany’s strict ambiance rules”— and, fumes nan Empire Center’s Ken Girardin, “it won’t person to” explain. The beverage plant, a task touted by Gov. Hochul, won nan authorities Public Service Commission’s OK to usage “natural state to tally nan plant.” Yet that conflicts pinch “the state’s greenhouse state goals,” and nan PSC is “invoking” nan Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act “as a limb against proposals to amended state readiness aliases reliability” for others. New York authorities now has 2 types of projects: “those scuttled because of CLCPA, and those getting nan all-clear from precocious places to proceed contempt it.”

Campaign beat: Dems Driving Doubters to MAGA

“Vice President Kamala Harris, her surrogate Democrats and nan left-leaning bequest media are each making maine — a blimpish who is not MAGA successful immoderate measurement — actively want to ballot for erstwhile President Donald Trump,” confesses USA Today’s Ingrid Jacques. They stress her “potential to make history arsenic nan country’s first female president,” yet astir group attraction much “about her policies — aliases deficiency thereof.” She “has truthful poorly defined what her presidency would look for illustration and what she really believes, she’s resorted to focusing squarely connected Trump and what’s happened successful nan past.” Between nan “nonsensical preaching connected democracy, nan media’s harping against Trump and liberals playing nan female card, I’ve had enough. And I whitethorn do precisely what they’re hoping group don’t: Vote for Trump.”

Compiled by The Post Editorial Board