Supreme Court will weigh in on new mostly Black Louisiana congressional district, after election

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will return up a caller redistricting lawsuit involving Louisiana’s legislature map pinch 2 mostly Black districts.

The tribunal won’t perceive arguments until early adjacent twelvemonth and nan 2024 elections are proceeding nether nan challenged map, which could boost Democrats’ chances of retaking nan intimately divided House of Representatives.

A lower court had invalidated nan map, but nan justices allowed it to beryllium utilized successful 2024 aft an emergency entreaty from nan authorities and civilian authorities groups.

The rumor successful beforehand of nan justices is whether nan authorities relied excessively heavy connected title successful drafting a 2nd mostly Black district.

The court’s bid Monday is nan latest measurement successful national tribunal battles complete Louisiana legislature districts that person lasted much than 2 years. Louisiana has had 2 legislature maps blocked by little courts and nan Supreme Court has intervened twice.

The state’s Republican-dominated legislature drew a caller legislature representation successful 2022 to relationship for organization shifts reflected successful nan 2020 Census. But nan changes efficaciously maintained nan position quo of 5 Republican-leaning mostly achromatic districts and 1 Democratic-leaning mostly Black territory successful a authorities that is astir one-third Black.

Noting nan size of nan state’s Black population, civilian authorities advocates challenged nan representation successful a Baton Rouge-based national tribunal and won a ruling from U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick that nan districts apt discriminated against Black voters.

The Supreme Court put Dick’s ruling connected clasp while it took up a akin lawsuit from Alabama. The justices allowed some states to usage nan maps successful nan 2022 elections moreover though some had been ruled apt discriminatory by national judges.

The precocious tribunal yet affirmed nan ruling from Alabama, which led to a caller representation and a 2nd territory that could elite a Black lawmaker. The justices returned nan Louisiana lawsuit to national court, pinch nan anticipation that caller maps would beryllium successful spot for nan 2024 elections.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals gave lawmakers successful Louisiana a deadline of early 2024 to tie a caller representation aliases look nan anticipation of a court-imposed map.

Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican, had defended Louisiana’s legislature representation arsenic nan state’s lawyer general. Now, though, he urged lawmakers to walk a caller representation pinch different mostly Black territory astatine a typical convention successful January. He backed a representation that created a caller mostly Black territory stretching crossed nan state, linking parts of nan Shreveport, Alexandria, Lafayette and Baton Rouge areas.

A different group of plaintiffs, a group of self-described non-African Americans, revenge suit successful occidental Louisiana, claiming that nan caller representation was besides forbidden because it was driven excessively overmuch by race, successful usurpation of nan Constitution. A divided sheet of national judges ruled 2-1 successful April successful their favour and blocked usage of nan caller map.

The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to put that ruling connected clasp and let nan representation to beryllium used.

State Attorney General Liz Murrill, whose agency has defended some maps enacted by lawmakers, called connected nan tribunal to “provide much clear guidance to legislators and trim judicial second-guessing aft nan Legislature does its job. Based upon nan Supreme Court’s astir caller pronouncements, we judge nan representation is constitutional.”

The authorities and civilian authorities groups were astatine likelihood complete nan first map, but are friends now.

“Federal rule requires Louisiana to person a adjacent representation that reflects nan powerfulness and sound of nan state’s Black communities,” Stuart Naifeh of nan NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund said successful a statement. “The authorities recognized arsenic overmuch erstwhile it adopted a caller representation pinch a 2nd majority-Black territory successful January. Now nan Supreme Court must do nan same.”

The Supreme Court ballot to usage nan challenged representation successful this year’s elections was different successful that nan dissenting votes came from nan 3 wide justices, who person been supportive of Black voters successful redistricting cases. But, successful an sentiment by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, they said their votes were motivated by their position that location was clip for a caller representation to beryllium drawn, and their disagreement pinch past tribunal orders that cited nan attack of an predetermination to artifact lower-court rulings.

“There is small consequence of elector disorder from a caller representation being imposed this acold retired from nan November election,” Jackson wrote successful May.

In adopting nan districts that are being utilized this year, Landry and his friends said nan driving facet was politics, not race. The legislature representation provides politically safe districts for House Speaker Mike Johnson and Majority Leader Steve Scalise, chap Republicans. Some lawmakers person besides noted that nan 1 Republican whose territory was greatly altered successful nan caller map, Rep. Garret Graves, supported a GOP force of Landry successful past fall’s governor’s race. Graves chose not to activity reelection nether nan caller map.

Among nan candidates successful nan caller territory is Democratic authorities Sen. Cleo Fields, a erstwhile congressman who is Black.

___

Associated Press writer Sara Cline contributed to this study from Baton Rouge.